We have a
reasonably good working knowledge of brain structure as a substrate supporting
information processing. This structure–function relationship presupposes that physically
describable brain mechanisms explain, questionably, the processing of every
kind of psychologically described experience.
There are cases,
for instances in which the conscious act of willfully altering the mode by
which experiential information is processed itself changes, in systematic ways,
the cerebral mechanisms utilized. More recently, neurological literature has
coined the term "self-directed neuroplasticity" to serve as a general
description of the principle that focused training and effort can
systematically alter cerebral function.
At the same time attempts
to understand the functional activity of the brain have so far mostly been
based on some principles of classical physics that have been challenged by more
contemporary quantum-based, uncertainty-bearing new physics.
According to the
classical conception of the world, all causal connections between observables,
tangibles are explainable in terms of mechanical interactions between material
realities. But this restriction on modes of causation is not fully maintained
by the currently applied principles of physics, which offer an alternative
conceptual foundation for the scientific description and modeling of the causal
structure of self-directed neuroplasticity.
Utilizing the
conceptual framework of contemporary physics has at least one advantage for
neuroscience and neuropsychology - Notions such as "feeling," and
"knowing" are intrinsically mentalistic and experiential, cannot be
described exclusively in terms of material structure.
Contemporary
physics might allow data from the emerging field of self-directed
neuroplasticity to be described and understood in a way that is more rationally
coherent and ultimately useful than what is permitted by theories in which all
causation is required to be fundamentally mechanical.
No comments:
Post a Comment