Recently reading the book Why Does The World Exist by
Jim Holt I came across the idea of an arithmetic nothingness. Holt explores the
mystery of existence including taking a philosophical tour and quantum based
spontaneous creation of something from nothing and so on…
So
back to the arithmetic – and in particular Zero and One (0 and 1). To the
Greeks and Romans the very idea of zero was inconceivable how could a nothing
be a something.
If
we let 0 stand for nothing and 1 for something then we get a sort of toy
version of the mystery of existence. How can you get from 0 to 1. In advanced
mathematics there is a simple sense in which the transition from 0 to 1 is
impossible.
A
number is regular if it can be reached via the numerical resources lying below
it. More precisely, the number n is regular if it cannot be reached by adding
up fewer than n numbers that are themselves smaller than n.
We
can see 1 is regular because it can’t be reached from below. The sum of 0s is
0.So the big question is whether there is a way of bridging the gap between 0
and 1 – between nothing and something.
Leibniz
thought he had found an answer and this is fascinating. One infinite series is
1/(1.x) = 1 + x + x(2) + x(3) + x(4) + ……
By
plugging in -1 into this series
½ =
1-1 + 1-1 + 1-1 + 1-1 + …..
½ =
(1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) + ……
and so
½ =
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 ….
The
equation seems to suggest that something can appear from nothing. Had Leibniz
stumbled on something?
This
is of course invalid. The infinite series isn’t convergent and so therefore a
series jumping between 0 and 1 makes no sense.
austine88
ReplyDeletelink austine88
link alternatif austine88
Bandar online slot dan togel
agen slot terlengkap
slot gacor
situs judi online
bandar togel
slot online terbaik
agen slot dan togel
situs togel dan slot
togel singapore
slot online terpercaya
agen slot
Pragmatic Play
Deposit pulsa
Deposit pulsa
livegames casino